Qualification for the 2023 Men's World Cup will be significantly different from how it has been. The event itself will still be restricted to just ten teams as is the case for the 2019 event. A three-step process has been included whereby 32 teams will partake in an elaborate qualification process involving 372 matches overall starting from July 2019 till May 2022. Out of this the eight teams from the CWC Super League, consisting of 13 teams will earn direct qualification while the bottom five will play a CWC qualifier, involving five more teams. The newly designed structure will see more ODI games for seven Associate Members
The ICC has gone under feedback beforehand to limit the 2019 World Cup to a ten-group issue. Relate Members felt essentially unnerved by the choice to limit and not extend the World Cup playing groups. ICC's CEO Dave Richardson feels that this move will take into account the prior requests.
"To date the World Cricket League has assumed an imperative job in enhancing models in Associate Member cricket, yet input from our conference with Members plainly enunciated the requirement for more continuous playing openings and more prominent assurance over when they would play.
"The new structure essentially expands the quantity of matches and focused playing open doors for our Members and also shortening the entire capability procedure to over two years, when beforehand it was six. There is a reasonable pathway now for groups hoping to meet all requirements for the ICC Men's Cricket World Cup," he said.
No new Test teams?
Furthermore, there could be a stop in new groups getting Test status, with the ICC choosing to inquire as to whether they'd be occupied with proceeding to play multi-day cricket, for example, the Intercontinental Cup.
"Following conference with Members, it has been concurred in regard to multi-day cricket, that the ICC will now look for Expressions of Interest from Members who have already contended in the I-Cup and/or World Cricket League Championship, who are sharp and focused on playing the multi-day organize. Following this, an organized multi-day rivalry on a cost-sharing premise will be proposed giving Members the decision of playing longer frame cricket," said an ICC media discharge.
These choices were taken in the ICC Board and Committee gatherings in Singapore.
ALSO READ:https://bit.ly/2yMsN2u
...ThankYou...
The ICC has gone under feedback beforehand to limit the 2019 World Cup to a ten-group issue. Relate Members felt essentially unnerved by the choice to limit and not extend the World Cup playing groups. ICC's CEO Dave Richardson feels that this move will take into account the prior requests.
"To date the World Cricket League has assumed an imperative job in enhancing models in Associate Member cricket, yet input from our conference with Members plainly enunciated the requirement for more continuous playing openings and more prominent assurance over when they would play.
"The new structure essentially expands the quantity of matches and focused playing open doors for our Members and also shortening the entire capability procedure to over two years, when beforehand it was six. There is a reasonable pathway now for groups hoping to meet all requirements for the ICC Men's Cricket World Cup," he said.
No new Test teams?
Furthermore, there could be a stop in new groups getting Test status, with the ICC choosing to inquire as to whether they'd be occupied with proceeding to play multi-day cricket, for example, the Intercontinental Cup.
"Following conference with Members, it has been concurred in regard to multi-day cricket, that the ICC will now look for Expressions of Interest from Members who have already contended in the I-Cup and/or World Cricket League Championship, who are sharp and focused on playing the multi-day organize. Following this, an organized multi-day rivalry on a cost-sharing premise will be proposed giving Members the decision of playing longer frame cricket," said an ICC media discharge.
These choices were taken in the ICC Board and Committee gatherings in Singapore.
ALSO READ:https://bit.ly/2yMsN2u
...ThankYou...
Comments
Post a Comment